Denmark's environmental health is decent, but not great. People's health is generally very good, with a high Human Development Index and high life expectancy. Additionally, the country invests in good mental and physical health. They have great economic opportunities with various careers, many scholarships, programs to maintain skills, a good medical program,and good education for medical careers. Their happiness and health is great, however their environmental health could be better. Sachs mentions in his text that agriculture is the main contributor to pollution, and Denmark's industries are largely agricultural. Their pesticide and fertilizer use could be better managed, and then the people's happiness and the environment's would both be great.
It would be more persuasive to have more evidence to back up the claims about environmental hazards.
ReplyDelete